The four-step process for challenging a denied disability claim - and most claims are denied at the first step.
Two different federal programmes pay disability benefits and they are frequently confused. SSDI is an insurance benefit, paid on the basis of a work record and the Social Security taxes paid into it. SSI is a needs-based benefit for people with limited income and resources, and does not depend on having worked. The medical test for disability is broadly the same for both; the financial eligibility rules are entirely different, and a person can be eligible for one, both, or neither.
An initial denial is the normal outcome rather than a sign the claim is weak, and this is the single most useful thing to know about the system. The appeal runs through four levels: reconsideration, a fresh review by the state agency; a hearing before an administrative law judge; review by the Appeals Council; and finally a civil action in federal district court. Each level has a filing deadline set by regulation, and missing one generally ends the appeal and forces a new claim - which can cost benefits for the earlier period even if the new claim succeeds.
The hearing before the administrative law judge is where most successful appeals are won. It is the first stage at which a human being hears the claimant directly, the first at which testimony can be given and vocational evidence questioned, and the first that is not a paper review by the same agency that issued the denial.
The decision turns on documented functional limitation rather than on diagnosis. A serious condition with thin medical records frequently loses; a less dramatic one with consistent treatment notes describing what the person cannot do can win. That gap between how sick someone is and what the file proves is what representatives spend most of their effort closing.
Representation is unusually accessible here, because fees are capped and agency-approved and are normally paid out of past-due benefits rather than up front - so the cost objection that stops people getting help in other areas largely does not apply. The value is concentrated at the administrative law judge hearing: developing the medical record, obtaining a treating source's opinion on specific functional limits, and cross-examining the vocational expert on whether the jobs identified actually exist for someone with those limits. Legal aid programmes and specialist representatives both take these cases.
These directory pages each list at least one currently published law firm. The list is generated when this page loads, so a page whose listings have lapsed drops out rather than becoming a dead link.